Minnesota sues federal agencies over $243 million Medicaid payment dispute

John Connolly, deputy commissioner of DHS and state Medicaid director
John Connolly, deputy commissioner of DHS and state Medicaid director
0Comments

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) have filed a federal lawsuit against the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The lawsuit challenges the federal government’s decision to withhold $243 million in Medicaid payments to Minnesota, an action state officials say is unlawful.

Medicaid, referred to as Medical Assistance in Minnesota, provides health insurance coverage to more than one million residents who cannot afford private insurance. A family of four may currently qualify if their income is at or below $42,759.

Attorney General Ellison criticized the move by federal officials, stating: “The Trump Administration’s M.O. is to cut first, no matter what the law says or who gets hurt, and ask questions later, if at all. These cuts are the latest in a long series of efforts to go around the law to punish Minnesotans — but just as we fought back and won when they illegally tried to cut funding for childcare, hungry families, and our schools, we are suing them again today to make them follow the law.”

He added: “My office has a strong track record of success in fighting Medicaid fraud: we’ve won more than 300 convictions and $80 million in judgments and restitution since I’ve served as Attorney General, and I’ve asked the Legislature for more tools and more resources to hold more fraudsters accountable. Fighting fraud should be bipartisan but the Trump Administration not only hasn’t helped the fight against fraud, they’ve actually harmed it. Trump’s attempts to look like he’s fighting fraud only punish the people and families who most need the high-quality, affordable healthcare that all Minnesotans deserve. As long as I am attorney general, I will do everything in my power to defend our tax dollars, both from fraudsters and from the Trump administration’s cruelty.”

John Connolly, deputy commissioner of DHS and state Medicaid director said: “The decision by federal officials to defer funding from Minnesota’s Medicaid program ignores the massive effort and resources we are already directing to identifying and addressing fraud – most of which are known to, or even directed by, CMS. It is extremely concerning to us given this could have a drastic and devastating impacts on Minnesotans who rely on our health care system.”

According to state officials, on January 6, 2026, federal authorities notified Minnesota that over $2 billion per year would be withheld due to alleged “noncompliance” with Medicaid regulations but did not specify what changes were required for compliance. After Minnesota appealed this notice—an action that triggers an administrative process—the CMS agreed on January 20th that it would provide relevant documents within 45 days; however last week requested an additional 45-day extension citing difficulties obtaining documents from senior leadership.

Before any hearing was scheduled regarding these claims of noncompliance or documentation issues raised by CMS’s audit tool known as deferral—which typically reviews individual claims rather than entire service areas—the Trump administration announced on February 25th it would immediately withhold $259 million in Medicaid payments owed to Minnesota. Of this amount about $243 million targets service areas also affected by earlier withholding announcements.

State leaders say this approach marks a significant departure from standard practice because such large-scale deferrals have never previously been used across whole service categories within states’ programs. The February 25th deferral alone exceeds past instances issued against Minnesota by more than fifteen times.

In their legal filing Ellison and DHS contend that withholding these funds violates due process rights under the Fifth Amendment as well as provisions within both administrative law statutes prohibiting arbitrary actions by federal agencies—and constitutional limits governing how Congress allocates spending authority.

The potential reduction represents about seven percent of Minnesota’s quarterly Medicaid budget; if allowed it could force substantial reductions in medical services for low-income residents or other government programs.

For further details visit the Office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.



Related

Chief Justice Natalie E. Hudson

Minnesota Client Security Board seeks new member to address lawyer dishonesty claims

The Minnesota Judicial Branch is inviting applications for a seat on the Client Security Board. This group reviews compensation claims from clients affected by lawyer misconduct. Interested attorneys must apply before May 8.

Chief Justice Natalie E. Hudson

Minnesota Judicial Branch seeks submissions for Senior QA Analyst by April 22, 2026

The Minnesota Judicial Branch has opened a request for submissions from approved vendors for a Senior QA Analyst role. Proposals are due by April 22, with key dates set for questions and responses before then. The initiative reflects ongoing efforts toward transparency and statewide service.

Chief Justice Natalie E. Hudson

Minnesota Judicial Branch seeks public comment on appellate procedure rule changes

The Minnesota Judicial Branch has opened a public comment period for proposed changes to appellate procedure rules. Residents can share their views before amendments are finalized. The move supports transparency and fairness in Minnesota’s judicial process.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Minnesota Courts Daily.